Live Network Acquisition with Pre-Serialization Hashing for Digital Evidence Integrity

Authors

  • Mirza Sutrisno Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta image/svg+xml Author
  • Anton Maulana Ibrahim Politeknik Mitra Karya Mandiri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71200/nexural.v1.i1.262

Keywords:

Digital Forensics, Network Forensics, SHA-256, Avalanche Effect, Digital Evidence Integrity

Abstract

The integrity of digital evidence remains a fundamental requirement in network forensic investigations, particularly during the live acquisition phase where packet captures are vulnerable to anti-forensic manipulation. Conventional forensic workflows generally perform cryptographic verification after packet data has been serialized into secondary storage, creating a temporary exposure window that may allow unauthorized modification before integrity validation occurs. This study proposes a proactive forensic acquisition framework that performs cryptographic hashing directly in volatile memory prior to storage serialization. The proposed architecture utilizes Python’s io.BytesIO() mechanism to temporarily preserve packet streams in RAM and generate SHA-256 signatures before physical .pcap file creation. To evaluate the robustness of the framework, ten PCAP datasets consisting of attack and normal traffic captures were processed using an in-memory hashing pipeline. A controlled single-bit tampering simulation was subsequently applied to each serialized file to measure cryptographic sensitivity through Hamming Distance and Avalanche Effect analysis. Experimental results demonstrate that all manipulated files produced complete cryptographic divergence from their original in-memory signatures. The average Hamming Distance reached 132.2 bits with a mean avalanche probability of 0.5164, closely matching the theoretical characteristics of secure hash functions. These findings indicate that pre-serialization integrity verification significantly improves the reliability of digital evidence preservation by reducing the vulnerability window associated with conventional post-acquisition hashing mechanisms.

References

J. Smith and A. Jones, “Global Cyber Threat Landscape: Annual Cybersecurity Report,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 204–215, 2023.

M. Al-Fawaer and H. Al-Mimi, “Network Forensics: Frameworks, Tools, and Challenges,” Journal of Cyber Security Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 112–128, 2022.

R. Howell and K. Mark, “The Impact of Chain of Custody Invalidation on Digital Evidence Admissibility,” Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, vol. 44, p. 301502, 2023.

S. Karumuri and P. Rao, “Analysis of Judicial Failures in Digital Evidence Preservation,” International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–61, 2024.

T. Wright, “Standard Operating Procedures for Network Packet Acquisition,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 78–85, 2023.

L. Chen, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “The Transition Window Vulnerability in Live Forensic Capturing,” Computers & Security, vol. 129, p. 103210, 2023.

A. Al-Dhafmari and M. S. Ahmad, “Anti-Forensic Techniques: Manipulating PCAP Metadata Before Serialization,” Journal of Network Forensics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 190–204, 2022.

G. Kumar and S. Bhatia, “Root-Level Tampering Detection in Cloud Storage Nodes,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 511–523, 2024.

P. Turner, “Cryptographic Hash Pitfalls in Post-Acquisition Forensic Workflows,” Digital Investigation, vol. 41, p. 200980, 2022.

B. Lee and J. Park, “On-the-Fly Cryptographic Primitives inside Volatile Memory for Secure Data Routing,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1289–1301, 2025.

H. Sukhwani and N. K. Singh, “Blockchain for Immutable Data Logging: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 14200–14215, 2023.

R. Sharma and P. Gupta, “Reactive Blockchain Frameworks in Digital Forensics: Limitations and Challenges,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1312–1325, 2023.

K. Tan and S. Ng, “Post-Incident Forensic Data Anchoring on Hyperledger Fabric,” Computers & Security, vol. 138, p. 103650, 2024.

D. Watson, “Local Storage Tampering Vulnerabilities in Modern VM Environments,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 40–49, 2024.

A. Gonzalez and F. Martinez, “Hybrid On-Chain and Off-Chain Storage Architecture for Large Scale Data Integrity,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 162, pp. 88–101, 2025.

I. Ali and H. Khan, “Proactive Integrity Frameworks using In-Memory Hashing and Simulated Ledger Verification,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1045–1058, 2026.

10-16

Downloads

Published

2026-05-24

How to Cite

Sutrisno, M., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2026). Live Network Acquisition with Pre-Serialization Hashing for Digital Evidence Integrity. International Journal of Nexural Intelligence, 1(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.71200/nexural.v1.i1.262

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)